UK Women Humanity’s Sole Representatives-JBS

The Watchman Books check them out!

Scientists in the United Kingdom believe that women may be evolving as humanity’s sole representatives.

There is a bill in the British parliament that may become law next summer saying fathers of artificially conceived children need not be recognized by the state. It’s called The Human Tissue and Embryos Bill and is barely raising an eyebrow in the UK. But it has caught the attention of some of those who would stand to gain from present scientific advances, social changes, and subsequently the legal changes that would result.

As if to lend credence to the dire predictions made in the bizarre 1969 hit song, In the Year 2525 [2], scientists drawing on the premise that male fertility is on the decline due to damaged genes on the Y chromosome are predicting that heterosexual reproduction may only last another 125,000 years or so. They draw this conclusion after noting that 7 percent of men are now infertile. They ignore, of course, that 93 percent of men are not infertile and probably very capable of reproduction. Despite this, “The core sex is female,” says Bryan Sykes, professor of human genetics at Oxford University, as he lends his voice to those in favor of proceeding with male-less involvement in conception. But can it really be accomplished?

In Japan, artificial sperm produced from bone-marrow cells led to pregnancies and live births in mice. Karim Nayernia, a professor of stem-cell biology at Newcastle University, has demonstrated that sperm can be manufactured from embryo stem cells, thereby ensuring unlimited sperm availability, but also unlimited dead babies in the process. Nayernia is presently awaiting permission to proceed with his experiments to produce synthetic sperm cells from women’s stem cells.

What does all this mean? It means scientists are more than willing to attempt to create a baby without the need for male involvement. It is proof positive that the push to destroy traditional families and morality continues all out. And it shows the intent that parenthood be reduced to nothing but a legal responsibility and not a human biological one. It also means that the state is willing to set a precedent, redefining a child’s biological origins in total opposition to the natural law.

The Human Tissue and Embryos Bill does recognize a new approach to parenthood suited to the gay and lesbian communities, and perhaps that’s the point. Even if the grandiose scheme to create babies could not be done without male involvement, genetic or otherwise, the legislation itself would still be a social sea change in favor of gays and lesbians.

Of course, the notion of men eventually dying off completely, leaving only females to run and rule the world is the height of absurdity and most likely wishful thinking — male bashing at its best (can’t you just feel the anger?) However, the damage done by this type of social engineering in recognizing, legitimizing, and promoting lesbian “families” in this fashion can have catastrophic consequences. David Velleman, professor of philosophy at New York University warned, “Our society has embarked on a vast social experiment in producing children designed to have no human relations with some of their biological relatives … permanently severed from their biological past … by deliberate intention.” He means there will be no father figure, no one to call upon to help deal with the problems presented by developing adolescents, and the loneliness and unhappiness of children who don’t know their own fathers.

One wonders if the developers of the new technology and recipients of artificially created babies will only accept female babies who are lesbians. It’s all so silly. The London Times article is not based on proper science. But it is an attack on the foundation of society — the family.

Source: http://jbs.org/trackback/6713

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Related posts:

1. Israel Destructive-From the Front An ICZC Commentary: By freeing Marwan Barghouti with all the...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.