The UN Security Council and the USA

Editors note: This came to us from our friends at ICZC, and contains an article on the recent UN security council resolution.

SHAME ON BUSH AND CONDI

This article, by Anne Bayefsky, originally appeared in Forbes.

Betrayal. No other word describes the reversal of American foreign policy that took place on the night of Jan. 8 when the U.S. refused to veto the Security Council resolution on Gaza.

A president whose friendship and alliance with Israel once appeared honest, perceptive and unshakable, decided two weeks before leaving office to throw Israel to the wolves. The resolution calls for a ceasefire in Gaza and does not even mention the word “Hamas.”

There will no longer be a need for an Obama transition team on foreign policy. The outgoing president and secretary of State have done it all. Yesterday’s resolution, along with another Condoleezza Rice-inspired resolution from mid-December, draws Israel into a Security Council spider web that U.N. enthusiasts have been weaving for decades.

Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton can simply step into George W. Bush and Condi Rice’s shoes, label themselves new-age multilateralists and let the chips–in this case, remnants of Israel–fall where they may.

The Security Council resolution makes a mockery of Israel’s right of self-defense. In fact, it makes no mention of a right of self-defense at all. Eight thousand mortars have rained down on Israel from the Gaza Strip over a period of eight years.
Israel withdrew every Israeli man, woman and child from Gaza three and a half years ago. Yet the United Nations draws an equivalence between a terrorist organization whose very modus operandi is to target civilians and a state whose aim is to protect civilians, Israeli and Palestinian.

Arab states could scarcely contain their glee. The U.K. went out in front and accepted the idea of a much stronger resolution instead of a Security Council presidential statement, and Secretary of State Rice rolled over and played dead within minutes.

Veto-wielding powers had reportedly given undertakings to Israel’s Prime Minister Ehud Olmert that they would not permit a resolution. These promises were ignored in the face of allegedly enormous pressure from undemocratic thugs, state sponsors of terrorism and weak democracies cowering at the prospect of unhappy Muslim constituencies or a dent in their bank accounts from belligerent Arab sheiks. What, moaned U.S. officials, was poor Condi to do?

Here is what she did:

1. The resolution she supported makes no mention whatsoever of Israel’s right of self-defense.

2. The resolution calls for a ceasefire while Israel is still under fire, thus gutting the right of self-defense.

3. The resolution puts a right of “all” states “to live in peace”–though Israel is the only state under fire–in its preamble instead of in the operative section of the resolution, where it would have carried substantive weight.

4. The resolution expresses grave concern only about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. No concern is expressed over the humanitarian crisis in Israel that has forced half a million people into underground holes for eight years and left Jewish children growing up with the trauma of fleeing and hiding throughout their young lives.

5. The resolution makes no mention of any need to return Hamas kidnap-victim and Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit. It does not even demand that Hamas or the Palestinian Authority abide by the humanitarian requirement under international law to permit a single visit to Shalit from the International Red Cross or any other international agency.

6. The resolution calls for “unimpeded” provision and distribution throughout Gaza of myriad forms of humanitarian assistance–which obviously makes the conduct of war against Hamas terrorists impossible.

7. The resolution condemns “all acts of terrorism”–without mentioning the identity of the terrorist–leaving Islamic countries to claim that Israel is the state terrorist and that the condemnation has nothing to do with Hamas.

8. The resolution places no mandatory responsibility on Egypt to stop the trafficking of weapons into the terrorist-controlled Gaza strip. It merely “calls for member states to intensify efforts” to stop the trafficking.

9. The resolution promotes further international intervention in the Arab-Israeli conflict, rather than a negotiated settlement between the two parties, by “welcoming…an international meeting in Moscow in 2009.” Code language for shoving U.N. terms and conditions down Israel’s throat.

10. The kicker is that the Security Council “decides to remain seized of the matter.” This means Israel’s failure to abide by any of the points in the resolution is grounds for more and more Security Council meetings designed to thwart Israel’s right to defend itself against the terrorism that threatens all civilized societies.

When it was over, Secretary of State Rice “abstained” with the following words: “this resolution, the text of which we support, the goals of which we support, and the objectives that we fully support, should indeed be allowed to go forward.” These words led other ambassadors to point out that the resolution had, in effect, been adopted by consensus.

For over half a century, the state of Israel and its tiny population has been on the front lines of a war against an evil that plagues every decent human being on earth. Israel has time and again sacrificed its children in freedom’s cause.

In leaving Israel to fend for itself in an international arena controlled by the enemies of decency and good, President Bush walks shamefully off the international stage, leaving in shambles everything he has stood for since Sept. 11, 2001.

Israel’s prime minister reacted to the resolution today by pointing to the obvious: It “will not be honored in actual fact by the Palestinian murder organizations.” And though UN actors wish it were otherwise, “The State of Israel has never agreed that any outside body would determine its right to defend the security of its citizens.”

This is a universal principle with which every American–and the U.N. Charter–would agree.

[source-email from ICZC, Anne Bayefsky wrote the following excellent, heartrending article in "Eye on the U.N." ]
WIBR/WARN Disclaimer and Fair USE:
This material is here for your education and edification. The WIBR/WARN online websites do not agree with all material,news articles, and other stories we put up. We urge you to research, study, and show yourself approved unto God, a Workman that needeth not be ashamed. We also urge you to Fast, Pray, and seek the LORD on all matters.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Update From Jerusalem

F-16s, solidarity and popcorn on the Gaza-Israel ‘border’
Jerusalem Watchman

I’m writing this (or at least starting to write it) on Israel’s “border” with the Gaza Strip.

Everybody calls it a border as if, like Egypt, Jordan, Syria and Lebanon, Gaza is one of the sovereign states adjacent to Israel. Probably it’s because people know the power of words – how you can make fiction into reality simply by repeating a non-truth over and over again.

Like Sky News Sunrise host Eamonn Holmes, who in a television interview with Israeli President Shimon Peres last Wednesday spoke repeatedly and quite matter-of-factly about Israel’s military operation in “this country of Palestine”

I would have thought a news anchor for an award-winning organization with a global reach like Sky would have a handle on something as basic as the names of the recognized nations of the world.

Of course, Holmes is not ignorant of the truth. He is a wishful thinker who also knows full well the power of propaganda. He wants to see a country of Palestine created in the historic homeland of the Jewish people, and intends to speak out its existence until it comes into being.

It works the other way too. Like if you don’t call something what it is then people will quickly come to accept that it isn’t that thing.

Take “terrorist” – a term used quite comfortably by British broadcasters and print journalists to describe IRA bombers, but eschewed by those same reporters when it comes to Islamic killers in Mumbai and Rafah.

But I digress. Or do I?

Swirling mist wreathed Jerusalem as my companions and I left the capital early in the morning, and headed towards the coastal plain. We needed just 90 minutes to reach Sderot – the small town that for eight years has been the favorite target of the terrorists in nearby Gaza.

Hamas – and the other Arab groups in the Strip – have fired thousands of rockets at this town of 20,000 and, more recently, at other Israeli population centers further and further away from Gaza, massively increasing its attacks after Israel abandoned the area in compliance with international insistence that it give the Palestinian Arabs a homeland here.

As they slammed into and around these cities day after day, most of the people on the planet were oblivious to the untiring effort to kill more Jews. Why? Because it wasn’t news. And if it’s not reported, as far as we’re all concerned, it isn’t happening.

By contrast, most everyone everywhere knows that Israel has been fighting against those Arab rocket and mortar launchers for the last two weeks – first from the air, and since last Saturday evening, also on the ground.

Those same reporters who grew tired of – or just didn’t care about – the suffering and terror deliberately inflicted on Israel’s civilians, have been falling over themselves to highlight and communicate to the world the suffering that Gaza’s civilians have unavoidably, and against the wishes of the Israelis, been caught up in.

Early as we were to leave Jerusalem, the day’s dose of rockets from Gaza had already begun to fly. Beer Sheva, Ashkelon, and four other towns in southern Israel had been hit. Stopping to greet a friend on duty at a Border Police unit near the Erez Crossing, we watched an unmanned IDF drone and two attack helicopters prowling the cloudy skies.

A few minutes later we were in Sderot where, less than an hour after we arrived, a “Color Red” alert sent us ducking for shelter together with a dozen or so teenagers who were part of a group set to leave for the resort town of Eilat on a sponsored three-day break from the tension and danger pervading their lives.

“The girls all look anorexic,” an associate said to me, quietly. I had already noticed the spindly legs and arms of virtually all the young women in the group. The boys were goofing off, appearing to behave much like teenage boys everywhere. But we’ve heard numerous reports of the damaged emotions and post-traumatic stress disorders suffered by so many of Sderot’s youth.

I’m not crazy about driving into war zones, or even into close proximity to such places. A father of five – momentarily to be six – children, I long ago relinquished the thrill of racing into dangerous areas the way I sometimes did as a cub reporter in my old homeland. How these children and their parents can still even be sane after living this Russian Roulette routine day after day for years is beyond me.

There’s another good friend here I’ve come to meet.

Karel Sedlacek, a Czech Christian Zionist, just flew to Israel from Prague and headed almost immediately for this besieged town. Moving into a small bedroom, he plans to spend two weeks here, visiting with the Israelis and getting to know and encourage some of them as he lives in solidarity with a people who are hated so much in this world. He is “settling in,” this grandfather who could so easily be enjoying the peaceful existence of a Czech Winter, tells me with a smile. His wife gave him her blessing to come. They are living out their faith in Israel’s God. In the coming days I hope to interview Karel about his experiences and insights here.

Hillocks dot the outskirts of Sderot. On one of them, a tree stands over the carved steel statue of a horse. Clusters of media vehicles are drawn up on the side: Foreign journalists – angered by the “nerve” of the IDF that has denied them entry into the closed military zone of Gaza – stand with their backs to Gaza City and rely on their long lenses and ingrained prejudices to deliver their “coverage” of the war to the world.

I am on a different hilltop, looking out across no-man’s land at the distant high rise buildings and listening to the deep and drawn-out brrrack-brrrack-brrrack of the 70 mm machine guns on the Apache helicopters firing from high overhead at – to me – invisible terrorists in the streets over there.

Without warning, three F-16 fighter jets come crashing through the air low and to our right, releasing  white-hot counter-measures against possible surface-to-air missiles as they drop down over Gaza City. We wonder what they are doing – no bombs are let go or missiles fired, and within seconds they are north of Gaza – again over Israel proper.

A plastic chair stands perched on the hillside. Next to it is a packet of popcorn, still fresh. A local tells me some of the town’s young people come up at night to watch the “show” – as the night sky is lit up by the explosions that shake the ground even here.
Black smoke billows from two targets in Gaza City as we drive away, heading back up the Judean lowlands towards Jerusalem. The ‘Cup o’Joes’ we stop at is still within range, though less so. The plasma-screens tell us it’s been a busy morning. A number of rockets have been fired from Lebanon, one crashing through the roof of a care home, and penetrating a bedroom vacated by its elderly resident just minutes before. A gas station right outside the Jerusalem-satellite community of Maaleh Adummim has been targeted by a would-be bomber – the police shot him dead.

In some ways we’re out of reach in Jerusalem – at least from the rockets, I think.

Then I see the latest map showing how the capital is not really out of range of the longer-range rockets the “Palestinians” have been smuggling into Gaza.

Just a few months ago we heard they would be targeting Beer Sheva, and we didn’t want to believe it.

How long before our feeling of relative security here in Jerusalem is ruptured too?

And what will Israel do then?
[source: Stan Goodenough, the Jerusalem Watchman-http://www.stangoodenough.com/]
WIBR/WARN Disclaimer and Fair USE:
This material is here for your education and edification. The WIBR/WARN online websites do not agree with all material,news articles, and other stories we put up. We urge you to research, study, and show yourself approved unto God, a Workman that needeth not be ashamed. We also urge you to Fast, Pray, and seek the LORD on all matters.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Supernatural Force Brings in the Obama Wave

Supernatural Force Brings in the Obama Wave
By the Watchman Dana G Smith
Keywords: Obama, supernatural, force, power, convince,

the one supernatural ONE

I have not seen in recent memory the love affair the media big shot’s have shown for a President Elect as they have done for Obama. Today early in the morning the news shows, were all lined up in a row on the vast television displays at our club and they had the President Elect on. I have seen him daily and more so. Everyone of them from ABC, CBS, NBC, and the one that literally swoons over the man we call the next President the most is CNN.

Now Barack has brought with him a diatribe of catchy phrases. The one that caught the most with Americans is “Change You can Believe in”. We can see this happening even now. The trouble with love affairs is that there is usually a disjointed lover somewhere. Either a former lover, or the present one, which may feel slighted. But in the swooning period of love making, both lovers embrace, arm in arm walking with eyes staring into each others down this lovers lane. The love affair for even the most ardent married couples never truly lasts in the arm in arm stage forever. For them, time and getting used to each other coupled with a love and a appreciation that goes deep down finds them joined in marital bliss. However political love affair’s can go south quickly.
Continue reading